Skip directly to content

Mayor-Governor-President (except me and Barack Obama)violated oath!

  • Delance's picture
    Started by
    (12 Jul '11)

    EXCEPTION: Capital Offenses
    "An indictment for any offense punishable by death may be found at any time without limitation. " 18 U.S.C. 3281 If the crime alleged is punishable by the death penalty, then there is no limitation on when the prosecution can begin.Macon Georgia Entire Bibb County Government Directory (Except me and Barck Obama ) and more have been Kidnapping Alex  Delance Antwain Harris and mines and concealing the First Degree Murder of Alex Harris Jr. a United States veteran and more from Olgethrope community!


    Macon Georgia radio and Newsstation 's been on this Violating freedom

    0
Delance's picture
on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 5:08pm

EXCEPTION: Capital Offenses
"An indictment for any offense punishable by death may be found at any time without limitation. " 18 U.S.C. 3281 If the crime alleged is punishable by the death penalty, then there is no limitation on when the prosecution can begin.Macon Georgia Entire Bibb County Government Directory (Except me and Barck Obama ) and more have been Kidnapping Alex  Delance Antwain Harris and mines and concealing the First Degree Murder of Alex Harris Jr. a United States veteran and more from Olgethrope community!


Macon Georgia radio and Newsstation 's been on this Violating freedom of press from 1996 and still today!
The First Amendment (Amendment I) to the United States Constitution is part of the Bill of Rights. The amendment prohibits the making of any law “respecting an establishment of religion,” impeding the free exercise of religion, abridging the freedom of speech, infringing on the freedom of the press, interfering with the right to peaceably assemble or prohibiting the petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances.

 

The Appropriate Congressional Committee means any committee of the House of Representatives or the Senate having legislative or oversight jurisdiction under the Rules of the House of Representatives or the Senate,respectively ,over the matter concerned.Macon georgia Congress and Senator's are a party to the crime of Capital and Murder and more crimes!
 asuhousing@asurams.edu.

Critical Infastructure has the meaning given that term in section 1016(e) of Public Law 107-56 (42 U.S.C.5195c(e))

Emergency Response Providers include Federal,State,and local emergency public safety,law enforcement,emergency response ,emergency medical including hospital emergency facilities ,and related personnel,agencies,and authorities
Section. 1. The judicial Power of the United States shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.

Section. 2.The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority; — to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls; — to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction; — to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party; — to Controversies between two or more States; — between a State and Citizens of another State [Modified by Amendment XI]; — between Citizens of different States; — between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.

In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.

The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the Trial shall be at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have directed.

Section. 3.Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.

18 U.S.C. § 248 : US Code - Section 248: Freedom of access to clinic entrances
Search 18 U.S.C. § 248 : US Code - Section 248: Freedom of access to clinic entrances
Search by Keyword or Citation   
(a) Prohibited Activities. - Whoever -
(1) by force or threat of force or by physical obstruction,
intentionally injures, intimidates or interferes with or attempts
to injure, intimidate or interfere with any person because that
person is or has been, or in order to intimidate such person or
any other person or any class of persons from, obtaining or
providing reproductive health services;
(2) by force or threat of force or by physical obstruction,
intentionally injures, intimidates or interferes with or attempts
to injure, intimidate or interfere with any person lawfully
exercising or seeking to exercise the First Amendment right of
religious freedom at a place of religious worship; or
(3) intentionally damages or destroys the property of a
facility, or attempts to do so, because such facility provides
reproductive health services, or intentionally damages or
destroys the property of a place of religious worship,
shall be subject to the penalties provided in subsection (b) and
the civil remedies provided in subsection (c), except that a parent
or legal guardian of a minor shall not be subject to any penalties
or civil remedies under this section for such activities insofar as
they are directed exclusively at that minor.
(b) Penalties. - Whoever violates this section shall -
(1) in the case of a first offense, be fined in accordance with
this title, or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and
(2) in the case of a second or subsequent offense after a prior
conviction under this section, be fined in accordance with this
title, or imprisoned not more than 3 years, or both;
except that for an offense involving exclusively a nonviolent
physical obstruction, the fine shall be not more than $10,000 and
the length of imprisonment shall be not more than six months, or
both, for the first offense; and the fine shall, notwithstanding
section 3571, be not more than $25,000 and the length of
imprisonment shall be not more than 18 months, or both, for a
subsequent offense; and except that if bodily injury results, the
length of imprisonment shall be not more than 10 years, and if
death results, it shall be for any term of years or for life.
(c) Civil Remedies. -
(1) Right of action. -
(A) In general. - Any person aggrieved by reason of the
conduct prohibited by subsection (a) may commence a civil
action for the relief set forth in subparagraph (B), except
that such an action may be brought under subsection (a)(1) only
by a person involved in providing or seeking to provide, or
obtaining or seeking to obtain, services in a facility that
provides reproductive health services, and such an action may
be brought under subsection (a)(2) only by a person lawfully
exercising or seeking to exercise the First Amendment right of
religious freedom at a place of religious worship or by the
entity that owns or operates such place of religious worship.
(B) Relief. - In any action under subparagraph (A), the court
may award appropriate relief, including temporary, preliminary
or permanent injunctive relief and compensatory and punitive
damages, as well as the costs of suit and reasonable fees for
attorneys and expert witnesses. With respect to compensatory
damages, the plaintiff may elect, at any time prior to the
rendering of final judgment, to recover, in lieu of actual
damages, an award of statutory damages in the amount of $5,000
per violation.
(2) Action by attorney general of the united states. -
(A) In general. - If the Attorney General of the United
States has reasonable cause to believe that any person or group
of persons is being, has been, or may be injured by conduct
constituting a violation of this section, the Attorney General
may commence a civil action in any appropriate United States
District Court.
(B) Relief. - In any action under subparagraph (A), the court
may award appropriate relief, including temporary, preliminary
or permanent injunctive relief, and compensatory damages to
persons aggrieved as described in paragraph (1)(B). The court,
to vindicate the public interest, may also assess a civil
penalty against each respondent -
(i) in an amount not exceeding $10,000 for a nonviolent
physical obstruction and $15,000 for other first violations;
and
(ii) in an amount not exceeding $15,000 for a nonviolent
physical obstruction and $25,000 for any other subsequent
violation.
(3) Actions by state attorneys general. -
(A) In general. - If the Attorney General of a State has
reasonable cause to believe that any person or group of persons
is being, has been, or may be injured by conduct constituting a
violation of this section, such Attorney General may commence a
civil action in the name of such State, as parens patriae on
behalf of natural persons residing in such State, in any
appropriate United States District Court.
(B) Relief. - In any action under subparagraph (A), the court
may award appropriate relief, including temporary, preliminary
or permanent injunctive relief, compensatory damages, and civil
penalties as described in paragraph (2)(B).
(d) Rules of Construction. - Nothing in this section shall be
construed -
(1) to prohibit any expressive conduct (including peaceful
picketing or other peaceful demonstration) protected from legal
prohibition by the First Amendment to the Constitution;
(2) to create new remedies for interference with activities
protected by the free speech or free exercise clauses of the
First Amendment to the Constitution, occurring outside a
facility, regardless of the point of view expressed, or to limit
any existing legal remedies for such interference;
(3) to provide exclusive criminal penalties or civil remedies
with respect to the conduct prohibited by this section, or to
preempt State or local laws that may provide such penalties or
remedies; or
(4) to interfere with the enforcement of State or local laws
regulating the performance of abortions or other reproductive
health services.
(e) Definitions. - As used in this section:
(1) Facility. - The term "facility" includes a hospital,
clinic, physician's office, or other facility that provides
reproductive health services, and includes the building or
structure in which the facility is located.
(2) Interfere with. - The term "interfere with" means to
restrict a person's freedom of movement.
(3) Intimidate. - The term "intimidate" means to place a person
in reasonable apprehension of bodily harm to him- or herself or
to another.
(4) Physical obstruction. - The term "physical obstruction"
means rendering impassable ingress to or egress from a facility
that provides reproductive health services or to or from a place
of religious worship, or rendering passage to or from such a
facility or place of religious worship unreasonably difficult or
hazardous.
(5) Reproductive health services. - The term "reproductive
health services" means reproductive health services provided in a
hospital, clinic, physician's office, or other facility, and
includes medical, surgical, counselling or referral services
relating to the human reproductive system, including services
relating to pregnancy or the termination of a pregnancy.
(6) State. - The term "State" includes a State of the United
States, the District of Columbia, and any commonwealth,
territory, or possession of the United States.

Exodus 23
Justice for All
 1 “You shall not circulate a false report. Do not put your hand with the wicked to be an unrighteous witness. 2 You shall not follow a crowd to do evil; nor shall you testify in a dispute so as to turn aside after many to pervert justice. 3 You shall not show partiality to a poor man in his dispute.
4 “If you meet your enemy’s ox or his donkey going astray, you shall surely bring it back to him again. 5 If you see the donkey of one who hates you lying under its burden, and you would refrain from helping it, you shall surely help him with it.
6 “You shall not pervert the judgment of your poor in his dispute. 7 Keep yourself far from a false matter; do not kill the innocent and righteous. For I will not justify the wicked. 8 And you shall take no bribe, for a bribe blinds the discerning and perverts the words of the righteous.
9 “Also you shall not oppress a stranger, for you know the heart of a stranger, because you were strangers in the land of Egypt.
The Law of Sabbaths
  
10 “Six years you shall sow your land and gather in its produce, 11 but the seventh year you shall let it rest and lie fallow, that the poor of your people may eat; and what they leave, the beasts of the field may eat. In like manner you shall do with your vineyard and your olive grove. 12 Six days you shall do your work, and on the seventh day you shall rest, that your ox and your donkey may rest, and the son of your female servant and the stranger may be refreshed.
13 “And in all that I have said to you, be circumspect and make no mention of the name of other gods, nor let it be heard from your mouth.
Three Annual Feasts
  
14 “Three times you shall keep a feast to Me in the year: 15 You shall keep the Feast of Unleavened Bread (you shall eat unleavened bread seven days, as I commanded you, at the time appointed in the month of Abib, for in it you came out of Egypt; none shall appear before Me empty); 16 and the Feast of Harvest, the firstfruits of your labors which you have sown in the field; and the Feast of Ingathering at the end of the year, when you have gathered in the fruit of your labors from the field.
17 “Three times in the year all your males shall appear before the Lord GOD.[a]
18 “You shall not offer the blood of My sacrifice with leavened bread; nor shall the fat of My sacrifice remain until morning. 19 The first of the firstfruits of your land you shall bring into the house of the LORD your God. You shall not boil a young goat in its mother’s milk.
The Angel and the Promises
  
20 “Behold, I send an Angel before you to keep you in the way and to bring you into the place which I have prepared. 21 Beware of Him and obey His voice; do not provoke Him, for He will not pardon your transgressions; for My name is in Him. 22 But if you indeed obey His voice and do all that I speak, then I will be an enemy to your enemies and an adversary to your adversaries. 23 For My Angel will go before you and bring you in to the Amorites and the Hittites and the Perizzites and the Canaanites and the Hivites and the Jebusites; and I will cut them off. 24 You shall not bow down to their gods, nor serve them, nor do according to their works; but you shall utterly overthrow them and completely break down their sacred pillars.
25 “So you shall serve the LORD your God, and He will bless your bread and your water. And I will take sickness away from the midst of you. 26 No one shall suffer miscarriage or be barren in your land; I will fulfill the number of your days.
27 “I will send My fear before you, I will cause confusion among all the people to whom you come, and will make all your enemies turn their backs to you. 28 And I will send hornets before you, which shall drive out the Hivite, the Canaanite, and the Hittite from before you. 29 I will not drive them out from before you in one year, lest the land become desolate and the beasts of the field become too numerous for you. 30 Little by little I will drive them out from before you, until you have increased, and you inherit the land. 31 And I will set your bounds from the Red Sea to the sea, Philistia, and from the desert to the River.[b] For I will deliver the inhabitants of the land into your hand, and you shall drive them out before you. 32 You shall make no covenant with them, nor with their gods. 33 They shall not dwell in your land, lest they make you sin against Me. For if you serve their gods, it will surely be a snare to you.”

IT's theses stupid muthafuckas with they anti-christ's asses fugitives from justice ass abomination to LORD asses!

Leviticus 20
Penalties for Breaking the Law
 1 Then the LORD spoke to Moses, saying, 2 “Again, you shall say to the children of Israel: ‘Whoever of the children of Israel, or of the strangers who dwell in Israel, who gives any of his descendants to Molech, he shall surely be put to death. The people of the land shall stone him with stones. 3 I will set My face against that man, and will cut him off from his people, because he has given some of his descendants to Molech, to defile My sanctuary and profane My holy name. 4 And if the people of the land should in any way hide their eyes from the man, when he gives some of his descendants to Molech, and they do not kill him, 5 then I will set My face against that man and against his family; and I will cut him off from his people, and all who prostitute themselves with him to commit harlotry with Molech.
6 ‘And the person who turns to mediums and familiar spirits, to prostitute himself with them, I will set My face against that person and cut him off from his people. 7 Consecrate yourselves therefore, and be holy, for I am the LORD your God. 8 And you shall keep My statutes, and perform them: I am the LORD who sanctifies you.
9 ‘For everyone who curses his father or his mother shall surely be put to death. He has cursed his father or his mother. His blood shall be upon him.
10 ‘The man who commits adultery with another man’s wife, he who commits adultery with his neighbor’s wife, the adulterer and the adulteress, shall surely be put to death. 11 The man who lies with his father’s wife has uncovered his father’s nakedness; both of them shall surely be put to death. Their blood shall be upon them. 12 If a man lies with his daughter-in-law, both of them shall surely be put to death. They have committed perversion. Their blood shall be upon them. 13 If a man lies with a male as he lies with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination. They shall surely be put to death. Their blood shall be upon them. 14 If a man marries a woman and her mother, it is wickedness. They shall be burned with fire, both he and they, that there may be no wickedness among you. 15 If a man mates with an animal, he shall surely be put to death, and you shall kill the animal. 16 If a woman approaches any animal and mates with it, you shall kill the woman and the animal. They shall surely be put to death. Their blood is upon them.
17 ‘If a man takes his sister, his father’s daughter or his mother’s daughter, and sees her nakedness and she sees his nakedness, it is a wicked thing. And they shall be cut off in the sight of their people. He has uncovered his sister’s nakedness. He shall bear his guilt. 18 If a man lies with a woman during her sickness and uncovers her nakedness, he has exposed her flow, and she has uncovered the flow of her blood. Both of them shall be cut off from their people.
19 ‘You shall not uncover the nakedness of your mother’s sister nor of your father’s sister, for that would uncover his near of kin. They shall bear their guilt. 20 If a man lies with his uncle’s wife, he has uncovered his uncle’s nakedness. They shall bear their sin; they shall die childless. 21 If a man takes his brother’s wife, it is an unclean thing. He has uncovered his brother’s nakedness. They shall be childless.
22 ‘You shall therefore keep all My statutes and all My judgments, and perform them, that the land where I am bringing you to dwell may not vomit you out. 23 And you shall not walk in the statutes of the nation which I am casting out before you; for they commit all these things, and therefore I abhor them. 24 But I have said to you, “You shall inherit their land, and I will give it to you to possess, a land flowing with milk and honey.” I am the LORD your God, who has separated you from the peoples. 25 You shall therefore distinguish between clean animals and unclean, between unclean birds and clean, and you shall not make yourselves abominable by beast or by bird, or by any kind of living thing that creeps on the ground, which I have separated from you as unclean. 26 And you shall be holy to Me, for I the LORD am holy, and have separated you from the peoples, that you should be Mine.
27 ‘A man or a woman who is a medium, or who has familiar spirits, shall surely be put to death; they shall stone them with stones. Their blood shall be upon them.’”
Proverbs 16
 1 The preparations of the heart belong to man,
      But the answer of the tongue is from the LORD.
       2 All the ways of a man are pure in his own eyes,
      But the LORD weighs the spirits.
       3 Commit your works to the LORD,
      And your thoughts will be established.
       4 The LORD has made all for Himself,
      Yes, even the wicked for the day of doom.
       5 Everyone proud in heart is an abomination to the LORD;
      Though they join forces,[a] none will go unpunished.
       6 In mercy and truth
      Atonement is provided for iniquity;
      And by the fear of the LORD one departs from evil.
       7 When a man’s ways please the LORD,
      He makes even his enemies to be at peace with him.
       8 Better is a little with righteousness,
      Than vast revenues without justice.
       9 A man’s heart plans his way,
      But the LORD directs his steps.
       10 Divination is on the lips of the king;
      His mouth must not transgress in judgment.
       11 Honest weights and scales are the LORD’s;
      All the weights in the bag are His work.
       12 It is an abomination for kings to commit wickedness,
      For a throne is established by righteousness.
       13 Righteous lips are the delight of kings,
      And they love him who speaks what is right.
       14 As messengers of death is the king’s wrath,
      But a wise man will appease it.
       15 In the light of the king’s face is life,
      And his favor is like a cloud of the latter rain.
       16 How much better to get wisdom than gold!
      And to get understanding is to be chosen rather than silver.
       17 The highway of the upright is to depart from evil;
      He who keeps his way preserves his soul.
       18 Pride goes before destruction,
      And a haughty spirit before a fall.
       19 Better to be of a humble spirit with the lowly,
      Than to divide the spoil with the proud.
       20 He who heeds the word wisely will find good,
      And whoever trusts in the LORD, happy is he.
       21 The wise in heart will be called prudent,
      And sweetness of the lips increases learning.
       22 Understanding is a wellspring of life to him who has it.
      But the correction of fools is folly.
       23 The heart of the wise teaches his mouth,
      And adds learning to his lips.
       24 Pleasant words are like a honeycomb,
      Sweetness to the soul and health to the bones.
       25 There is a way that seems right to a man,
      But its end is the way of death.
       26 The person who labors, labors for himself,
      For his hungry mouth drives him on.
       27 An ungodly man digs up evil,
      And it is on his lips like a burning fire.
       28 A perverse man sows strife,
      And a whisperer separates the best of friends.
       29 A violent man entices his neighbor,
      And leads him in a way that is not good.
       30 He winks his eye to devise perverse things;
      He purses his lips and brings about evil.
       31 The silver-haired head is a crown of glory,
      If it is found in the way of righteousness.
       32 He who is slow to anger is better than the mighty,
      And he who rules his spirit than he who takes a city.
       33 The lot is cast into the lap,
      But its every decision is from the LORD.


breach of the peace     Also found in: Dictionary/thesaurus, Encyclopedia, Wikipedia 0.02 sec.
Ads by GooglePublic Arrest Records
See anyone's past criminal history. Unlimited searches. Peace of mind.
instantcheckmate.com
Criminal Records
Look Up Someone's Criminal Records Arrest, Warrants, Jail Time & More.
www.IdentityPI.com
ITT Tech - Official Site
100+ Locations & Online Programs Official ITT Tech Site. Get Info!
www.itt-tech.edu
A comprehensive term encompassing acts or conduct that seriously endanger or disturb public peace and order.

A breach of the peace was a common-law offense, but is presently governed by statute in many states. It is frequently defined as constituting a form of Disorderly Conduct. Examples include using abusive or obscene language in a public place, resisting a lawful arrest, and trespassing or damaging property when accompanied by violence.

Statutes commonly require that conduct constituting a breach of the peace must be clearly a type of misbehavior resulting in public unrest or disturbance. As an example, a prostitute who solicited men walking by on a public street from her window was found guilty of breaching the peace, but a man who raised his voice to a police officer while the officer was issuing a ticket to him was not guilty of the same offense.

A breach of the peace is synonymous with a disturbance of the peace. Jurisdictions that do not have a specific statutory provision for the offense may punish it as a form of disorderly conduct. The usual penalty imposed is either a fine, imprisonment, or both.

West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

breach of the peace n. any act which disturbs the public or even one person. It can include almost any criminal act causing fear or attempting intimidation, such as displaying a pistol or shouting inappropriately. (See: breach)

Copyright © 1981-2005 by Gerald N. Hill and Kathleen T. Hill. All Right reserved.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See also: brawl, fracas, infraction, outbreak, outburst, riot
Burton's Legal Thesaurus, 4E. Copyright © 2007 by William C. Burton. Used with permission of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BREACH OF THE PEACE. A violation of public order; the offence of disturbing the public peace. One guilty of this offence may be held to bail for his good behaviour. An act of public indecorum is also a breach of the peace. The remedy for this offence is by indictment. Vide Pace,

 
slan·der   /?slænd?r/  Show Spelled
[slan-der]  Show IPA
 
–noun
1. defamation; calumny: rumors full of slander.
2. a malicious, false, and defamatory statement or report: a slander against his good name.
3. Law . defamation by oral utterance rather than by writing, pictures, etc.
Ask a Lawyer: Slander
19 Lawyers Are Online. Slander Law Answers Today: 17.

law.justanswer.com/Slander
 
Ad–verb (used with object)
4. to utter slander against; defame.
Slander
Find Slander Local Attorneys - Start in Seconds!

www.requestlegalhelp.com
 
Ad–verb (used without object)
5. to utter or circulate slander.
Use slander in a Sentence
See images of slander
Search slander on the Web

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Origin:
1250–1300; (noun) Middle English s ( c ) laundre  < Anglo-French esclaundre,  Old French esclandre,  alteration of escandle  < Late Latin scandalum  cause of offense, snare ( see scandal); (v.) Middle English s ( c ) laundren  to cause to lapse morally, bring to disgrace, discredit, defame < Old French esclandrer, derivative of esclandre

Stalking, Criminal Harassment and Cyberbullying

 Printer Friendly  
Script 206 gives information only, not legal advice. If you have a legal problem or need legal advice, you should speak to a lawyer. For the name of a lawyer to consult, call Lawyer Referral at 604.687.3221 in the lower mainland or 1.800.663.1919 elsewhere in British Columbia.

The script explains what stalking, criminal harassment, and cyberbullying are and how to stop them. Refer also to scripts:

217, called “Applying for a peace bond and filing assault charges”
215, called “Charging someone with a criminal offense”
What is stalking?
Stalking is behaviour that may – in some cases – be criminal harassment under section 264 of the Criminal Code of Canada. Stalking is criminal harassment if a person does any of the following things, knowing that it causes you to reasonably fear for your safety or the safety of anyone you know:

repeatedly follow you, or anyone you know.
repeatedly communicate with you, or anyone you know, directly or indirectly.
repeatedly watch you, or anyone you know, or lurk around your home, workplace, or any other place you happen to be
engage in any threatening conduct directed at you or a member of your family
Even if the person doing these things has not been told or doesn’t know that you fear for your safety or the safety of anyone you know, if they should have known, then these behaviours may still be criminal harassment.

A person can be stalking even if they don’t physically hurt anyone or damage any property. The law is designed to protect psychological, emotional, and physical safety.

Stalking may start with conduct that seems more annoying than dangerous. Often, the conduct is legal and even socially acceptable, if it’s just an isolated incident. But when it’s repeated, it may scare the victim. Conduct such as following someone, or sending gifts or letters, may become intimidating if done continually and against the person’s wishes.

What is cyberbullying?
Cyberbullying is a type of harassment using new technology. Whether it is criminal harassment depends on the facts of a case. Cyberbullies use social media (such as Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube), blogs, texting, instant messaging, and other internet avenues to engage in deliberate, repeated, and hostile behaviour intended to harm, embarrass, or slander someone. Although their work is public, cyberbullies are anonymous and it is often harder to identify and stop them.

Cyberbullying may also be defamation. The Criminal Code (section 300) outlaws publishing a "defamatory libel" – material published, without lawful justification or excuse, likely to injure the reputation of any person by exposing them to hatred, contempt or ridicule, or designed to insult the person. But criminal defamation is rare. More common is civil defamation – communication about a person that tends to hurt their reputation. Script 240, called “Defamation: Libel and Slander”, has more on this.

What can you do if someone is stalking, harassing, or cyberbullying you?

First, if the harassment is attempted communication with you, tell the person to stop. Otherwise, they may not know that they are harassing you. Otherwise, never reply to harassing messages.
Call the police to report the problem. Record the details of every incident, including time, date, place, who was involved, and what was said and done. Keep letters, notes, voicemail messages, emails, texts, instant messages, and social media and internet posts. Give them to the police.
If the harassment happens at school, report it to the school authorities, as well as to the police. If it happens at work, report it to your boss, plus the police. 
Report cyberbullying or other harassing communication to your internet or cellphone company. Most companies have policies on acceptable use of their services, and can cancel the service of a customer who violates those policies. The company can also help police find a cyberbully who is using their network.
If you get a harassing phone call on a landline, dial *57 immediately when the call ends. The phone company will record the phone number that made the call, so the police can get it. If you receive harassing calls on your cell phone, call the phone company for help in tracking the calls.
You can also seek a civil restraining order in court. But to do this, you need legal advice.
What happens after you report the problem?
If a person is charged with criminal harassment, Crown Counsel (the prosecutor) makes the case against (or prosecutes) them. The prosecutor may proceed by indictment for serious cases, and then the maximum penalty is 10 years in jail. Or the prosecutor may proceed by summary conviction for less serious cases, and then the maximum penalty is either a fine or 6 months in jail, or both.

If a court finds a person guilty, it will probably order the person to obey certain conditions. For example, a court will normally order a person convicted of criminal harassment to have no contact with you directly or indirectly, to stay away from your home and workplace, and to not own or carry any weapons. A court may also order a convicted person to take counseling, if it might help.

If the court sends the person to jail and fines them, it cannot also order them to obey conditions. Usually, a court will order the person to obey conditions and either fine or jail them.

More information
Learn more about what you can do from the following sources:

The Victim LinkLine at 1.800.563.0808, available 24 hours a day. The website is www.victimlinkbc.ca.
The BC Ministry of Public Safety and Solicitor General publication called “Stalking and Criminal Harassment”. Search for “stalking” on its website at www.gov.bc.ca/pssg.
The Cyberbullying resource page at www.cyberbullying.ca.
Web Aware at www.bewebaware.ca. Click on “cyberbullying”. 
The Canada Safety Council at www.safety-council.org. Click on “Cyber Bullying”.
[updated January 2011]


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dial-A-Law© is a library of legal information that is available:

by phone, as recorded scripts, and
by audio and text, on the CBA BC Branch website.
To access Dial-A-Law, call 604.687.4680 in the lower mainland or 1.800.565.5297 elsewhere in BC. Dial-A-Law is available online at www.cba.org/bc in Public & Media.

The Dial-A-Law library is prepared by lawyers and gives practical information on many areas of law in British Columbia. Dial-A-Law is funded by the Law Foundation of British Columbia and sponsored by the Canadian Bar Association, British Columbia Branch.

© Copyright 1983-2011 The Canadian Bar Association, British Columbia Branch
 
kidnapping    Also found in: Dictionary/thesaurus, Medical, Encyclopedia, Wikipedia, Hutchinson 0.01 sec.
Ads by GoogleAsk a Lawyer Online Now
24 Lawyers Are Online. Current Wait Time: 10 Minutes.
Law.JustAnswer.com
ITT Tech - Official Site
100+ Locations & Online Programs Official ITT Tech Site. Get Info!
www.itt-tech.edu
Public Arrest Records
See anyone's past criminal history. Unlimited searches. Peace of mind.
instantcheckmate.com
The crime of unlawfully seizing and carrying away a person by force or Fraud, or seizing and detaining a person against his or her will with an intent to carry that person away at a later time.

The law of kidnapping is difficult to define with precision because it varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Most state and federal kidnapping statutes define the term kidnapping vaguely, and courts fill in the details.

Generally, kidnapping occurs when a person, without lawful authority, physically asports (i.e., moves) another person without that other person's consent, with the intent to use the abduction in connection with some other nefarious objective. Under the Model Penal Code (a set of exemplary criminal rules fashioned by the American Law Institute), kidnapping occurs when any person is unlawfully and non-consensually asported and held for certain purposes. These purposes include gaining a ransom or reward; facilitating the commission of a felony or a flight after the commission of a felony; terrorizing or inflicting bodily injury on the victim or a third person; and interfering with a governmental or political function (Model Penal Code § 212.1).

Kidnapping laws in the United States derive from the Common Law of kidnapping that was developed by courts in England. Originally, the crime of kidnapping was defined as the unlawful and non-consensual transportation of a person from one country to another. In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, states began to redefine kidnapping, most notably eliminating the requirement of interstate transport.

At the federal level, Congress passed the Lindbergh Act in 1932 to prohibit interstate kidnapping (48 Stat. 781 [codified at 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 1201 et seq.]). The Lindbergh Act was named for Charles A. Lindbergh, a celebrated aviator and Air Force colonel whose baby was kidnapped and killed in 1932. The act provides that if a victim is not released within 24 hours after being abducted, a court may presume that the victim was transported across state lines. This presumption may be rebutted with evidence to the contrary. Other federal kidnapping statutes prohibit kidnapping in U.S. territories, kidnapping on the high seas and in the air, and kidnapping of government officials (18 U.S.C.A. §§ 1201 et seq., 1751 et seq.).

A person who is convicted of kidnapping is usually sentenced to prison for a certain number of years. In some states, and at the federal level, the term of imprisonment may be the remainder of the offender's natural life. In jurisdictions that authorize the death penalty, a kidnapper is charged with a capital offense if the kidnapping results in death. Kidnapping is so severely punished because it is a dreaded offense. It usually occurs in connection with another criminal offense, or underlying crime. It involves violent deprivation of liberty, and it requires a special criminal boldness. Furthermore, the act of moving a crime victim exposes the victim to risks above and beyond those that are inherent in the underlying crime.

Most kidnapping statutes recognize different types and levels of kidnapping and assign punishment accordingly. New York State, for example, bases its definition of first-degree kidnapping on the purpose and length of the abduction. First-degree kidnapping occurs when a person abducts another person to obtain ransom (N.Y. Penal Code § 135.25 [McKinney 1996]). First-degree kidnapping also occurs when the abduction lasts for more than 12 hours and the abductor intends to injure the victim; to accomplish or advance the commission of a felony; to terrorize the victim or a third person; or to interfere with a governmental or political function. An abduction that results in death is also first-degree kidnapping. A first-degree kidnapping in New York State is a class A-1 felony, which carries a sentence of at least 20 years in prison (§ 70.00).

New York State also has a second-degree kidnapping statute. A person is guilty of second-degree kidnapping if he or she abducts another person (§ 135.20). This crime lacks the aggravating circumstances in first-degree kidnapping, and it is ranked as a class B felony. A person who is convicted of a class B felony in New York State can be sentenced to one to eight years in prison (§ 70.00).

Two key elements are common to all charges of kidnapping. First, the asportation ordetention must be unlawful. Under various state and federal statutes, not all seizures and asportations constitute kidnapping: Police officers may arrest and jail a person they suspect of a crime, and parents are allowed to reasonably restrict and control the movement of their children.

Second, some aggravating circumstance must accompany the restraint or asportation. This can be a demand for money; a demand for anything of value; an attempt to affect a function of government; an attempt to inflict injury on the abductee; an attempt to terrorize a third party; or an attempt to commit a felony.

In most states, kidnapping statutes specify that any unlawful detention or physical movement of a child, other than that performed by a parent or guardian, constitutes kidnapping. An abduction of a child thus need not be accompanied by some other circumstance, such as Extortion or physical injury, to qualify for the highest level of kidnapping charge. In the absence of an aggravating circumstance, an unlawful, non-consensual restraint or movement is usually charged as something less than the highest degree or level of kidnapping.

Many states have enacted special laws for Carjacking, a specialized form of kidnapping. Generally, carjacking occurs when one person forces a driver out of the driver's seat and steals the vehicle. Carjacking is a felony whether the aggressor keeps the victim in the car or forces the victim from the car. In California, a carjacking statute is contained within the penal code's chapter on kidnapping, and it carries a sentence of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. (Cal. Penal Code § 209.5 [West]).

Kidnapping laws are similar to laws on unlawful or felonious restraint, parental kidnapping, and False Imprisonment. These crimes cover the range of unlawful-movement and unlawful-restraint cases. Felonious or unlawful restraint, also known as simple kidnapping, is the unlawful restraint of a person that exposes the victim to physical harm or places the victim in Slavery. It is a lesser form of kidnapping because it does not require restraint for a specified period or specific purpose (such as to secure money or commit a felony). False imprisonment is a relatively inoffensive, harmless restraint of another person. It is usually a misdemeanor, punishable by no more than a year in jail. Parental kidnapping is the abduction of a child by a parent. The law on parental kidnapping varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction: Some jurisdictions define it as a felony, others as a misdemeanor. Many states consider parental kidnapping to be less offensive than classic kidnapping because of the strong bond between parents and children.

The chief judicial concern with the charge of kidnapping is Double Jeopardy, which is multiple punishment for the same offense. It is prohibited by the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Kidnapping often is an act that facilitates another offense, such as rape, Robbery, or assault. Rape, robbery, and assault often involve the act of moving a person against his or her will, which is the gravamen (i.e., the significant element) of a kidnapping charge. Thus, a persistent problem with kidnapping prosecutions is in determining whether a kidnapping conviction would constitute a second punishment for the same act.

Legislatures have passed statutes, and courts have fashioned rules, to prevent and detect double jeopardy in kidnapping cases. Generally, these laws and rules hold that for kidnapping to be charged as a separate crime, some factor must set the asportation apart from a companion crime. Most courts will sustain multiple convictions if the asportation exposes the victim to increased risk of harm or results in harm to the victim separate from that caused by the companion offense. In other jurisdictions, the test is whether the asportation involves a change of environment or is designed to conceal a companion offense.

In most states, an asportation of a few feet may constitute the separate offense of kidnapping; in other states, distance is not a factor. In New York State, for example, the focus of the kidnapping statute is not distance, but purpose. Thus, an asportation of 27 city blocks might not constitute kidnapping if it is merely incidental to a companion crime (People v. Levy, 15 N.Y.2d 159, 256 N.Y.S.2d 793, 204 N.E.2d 842 [N.Y. 1965]). Likewise, an asportation from the borough of Manhattan to the borough of Queens might not constitute kidnapping if it plays no significant role in the commission of another crime (People v. Lombardi, 20 N.Y.2d 266, 282 N.Y.S.2d 519, 229 N.E.2d 206 [Ct. App. 1967]).

Some states have eliminated the asportation element from their kidnapping statutes. In Ohio, for example, kidnapping is defined in part as restraining the liberty of another person (Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 2905.01 [Baldwin 1996]). This creates an increased risk of double jeopardy in kidnapping convictions because, by definition, every robbery, rape, or assault would constitute kidnapping. However, the Ohio state legislature has enacted a statute that prohibits multiple convictions for the same conduct unless the defendant exhibits a separate animus (i.e., a separate intent) to commit a separate crime (§ 2941.25). Whether the prosecution proves a separate animus to kidnap is a Question of Fact based on the circumstances surrounding the crime.

In State v. Logan, 60 Ohio St. 2d 126, 397 N.E.2d 1345, 14 Ohio Op. 3d 373 (1979), the Supreme Court of Ohio held that the defendant could not be convicted of both rape and kidnapping when he had moved the victim a mere few feet and had released the victim immediately after the rape. Under the facts of the case, the asportation had no significance apart from the rape offense. According to the court, the defendant had displayed no animus beyond that necessary to commit rape, so punishment for both rape and kidnapping was not warranted.

In contrast, in State v. Wagner, 191 Wis. 2d 322, 528 N.W.2d 85 (Ct. App. 1995), the appeals court upheld a separate conviction for kidnapping. In Wagner, the defendant approached two women on two separate occasions in a laundromat. Both times, the defendant tried to force the women into a bathroom to rape them. He was convicted of two counts of attempted first-degree sexual assault, one count of kidnapping while armed, and one count of attempted kidnapping while armed. On appeal, he argued that he should not have been convicted of kidnapping because, under section 940.31(1)(a) of the Wisconsin Statutes, kidnapping is defined in part as the carrying of a person "from one place to another," and he had not taken his victims to another place. The court disagreed, holding that forced movement from one room to another falls within the meaning of the kidnapping statute. Ultimately, the appeals court affirmed the defendant's sentence of 72 years in prison.

The kidnapping of children has presented a particularly emotional issue for lawmakers. In 1984, in response to the kidnapping and murder of his child Adam, John Walsh founded the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC). NCMEC serves as a resource in providing assistance to parents, children, law enforcement, schools, and the community in recovering missing children and raising public awareness about ways to help prevent child abduction.

In 1996, the kidnapping and murder of Amber Hagerman in Texas inspired the Dallas/Fort Worth Association of Radio Managers and local law enforcement agencies in north Texas to create the nation's first "AMBER Alert" plan. AMBER, in addition to being Amber Hagerman's first name, also serves as an acronym for America's Missing: Broadcast Emergency Response. "Amber Alert" plans allow the development of an early warning system to help find abducted children by broadcasting information over radio and television to the public as quickly as possible. This information includes descriptions and pictures of the missing child, the suspected abductor, a suspected vehicle, and any other information available and valuable to identifying the child and suspect.

From its beginnings in Texas, the AMBER Alert system spread until, by 2002, 55 versions had been adopted at local, regional, and statewide levels. Eighteen states had adopted the plan by 2002, urged on by the NCMEC, which adopted the AMBER Alert as one of its top priorities. As a result, many people were convinced that the late 1990s and new millennium saw a sharp decline in child kidnappings, which were well publicized, thanks to AMBER Alerts. In fact, the FBI reported that child abductions had actually declined from the 1980s, from an average between 200 and 300 per year to only 93 in 2000.

The AMBER Alerts were considered so successful—credited with recovering 30 children—that Congress passed a national AMBER Alert bill as part of the Prosecutorial Remedies and Other Tools to end the Exploitation of Children Today (PROTECT) Act of 2003, Pub. L. No. 108-21, 117 Stat. 650. Under this bill, the attorney general, in cooperation with the secretary of transportation and the chairman of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), appoints a National AMBER Alert Coordinator to oversee the communication network. The AMBER Alert Coordinator at the Justice Department works with states, broadcasters, and law enforcement agencies to set up AMBER plans, to serve as a point of contact to supplement existing AMBER plans, and to facilitate appropriate regional coordination of AMBER Alerts. Grants were provided to help set up effective AMBER Alert programs at the state and local levels.

Further readings
Blinka, Daniel D., and Thomas J. Hammer. 1995. "Court of Appeals Digest." Wisconsin Lawyer 68 (April).

Diamond, John L. 1985. "Kidnapping: A Modern Definition." American Journal of Criminal Law 13.

Hillebrand, Joseph R. 1991. "Parental Kidnapping and the Tort of Custodial Interference: Not in a Child's Best Interests." Indiana Law Review 25.

Kaplan, John, and Robert Weisberg. 1991. Criminal Law: Cases and Materials. 2d ed. Boston: Little, Brown.

Leahy, Patrick. 2002. Statement Regarding an AMBER Alert National System. Washington D.C.: Federal Document Clearing House (September 4).

National Center for Missing and Exploited Children. "National AMBER Alert Network Will Now Become Law." Available online at <www.ncmec.org>.

Onion, John F. 1995. "Mass Media's Impact on Litigation: A Judge's Perspective." Review of Litigation 14.

Cross-references
Hearst, Patty; Lindbergh Kidnapping.

West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

kidnapping n. the taking of a person against his/her will (or from the control of a parent or guardian) from one place to another under circumstances in which the person so taken does not have freedom of movement, will, or decision through violence, force, threat or intimidation. Although it is not necessary that the purpose be criminal (since all kidnapping is a criminal felony) the capture usually involves some related criminal act such as holding the person for ransom, sexual and/or sadistic abuse, or rape. It includes taking due to irresistible impulse and a parent taking and hiding a child in violation of court order. An included crime is false imprisonment. Any harm to the victim coupled with kidnapping can raise the degree of felony for the injury and can result in a capital (death penalty) offense in some states, even though the victim survives. Originally it meant the stealing of children, since "kid" is child in Scandinavian languages, but now applies to adults as well.

 

 

Local Government means a county ,municipality,city,town,township,local public authority,school district,special district,intrastate district,council of governments
are all a party to the crime Kidnapping ,Capital Offenses Punishable by Death with No statute of Limitation to be Prosecute, and more!


Macon georgia citizens and Informants are a party to all crimes Kidnapping,Captial Offenses Punishable by death ,Breach of the Peace ,and more!

Section. 2.The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on Demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to be removed to the State having Jurisdiction of the Crime.

No Person held to Service or Labour in one State, under the Laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in Consequence of any Law or Regulation therein, be discharged from such Service or Labour, but shall be delivered up on Claim of the Party to whom such Service or Labour may be due


45-8-212. Criminal defamation. (1) Defamatory matter is anything that exposes a person or a group, class, or association to hatred, contempt, ridicule, degradation, or disgrace in society or injury to the person's or its business or occupation.
     (2) Whoever, with knowledge of its defamatory character, orally, in writing, or by any other means, including by electronic communication, as defined in 45-8-213, communicates any defamatory matter to a third person without the consent of the person defamed commits the offense of criminal defamation and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than 6 months in the county jail or a fine of not more than $500, or both.
     (3) Violation of subsection (2) is justified if:
     (a) the defamatory matter is true;
     (b) the communication is absolutely privileged;
     (c) the communication consists of fair comment made in good faith with respect to persons participating in matters of public concern;
     (d) the communication consists of a fair and true report or a fair summary of any judicial, legislative, or other public or official proceedings; or
     (e) the communication is between persons each having an interest or duty with respect to the subject matter of the communication and is made with the purpose to further the interest or duty.
     (4) A person may not be convicted on the basis of an oral communication of defamatory matter except upon the testimony of at least two other persons that they

TREASON
This word imports a betraying, treachery, or breach of allegiance.

The Constitution of the United States, Art. III, defines treason against the United States to consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid or comfort. This offence is punished with death. By the same article of the Constitution, no person shall be convicted of treason, unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court

Macon georgia Judges-Prosecuting Attorney-Police and Sheriff-Doctor and Nurses-citizens and informants are all involved in that and more they are facing the death chair!

Stay far away from Mercer Law Library due the fact !I have No Statute of Limitation and they are partners and stakeholder's and interns of the Prosecuting attorney involved in the crimes'!central Highschool Class of 1999 is still employed at Bibb County House warrant Divison who are also a party to all past and present crimes' ever since I reported the 2005 Kidnapping committed by the Bibb County Superior Judges and more!

Forum category: